Iranian Journal of Orthodontics

Published by: Kowsar

Agreement of Dental Students in the Detection of Normal Landmarks When Comparing Digital Lateral Cephalograms and Three-Dimensional Cone Beam Computed Tomography Images

Zahra Dalili Kajan 1 , * , Navid Karimi Nasab 2 , Jalil Khademi 2 , Faegheh Gholinia 2 , Zeinab Taheri 3 and Mona Hajighadimi 4
Authors Information
1 Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Department, Dental School, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, IR Iran
2 Orthodontics Department, Dental School, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, IR Iran
3 Dentist, Dental School, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, IR Iran
4 Dentist, Private Clinic, Rasht, IR Iran
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Orthodontics: June 30, 2016, 11 (1); e5251
  • Published Online: May 30, 2016
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: January 3, 2016
  • Accepted: January 26, 2016
  • DOI: 10.17795/ijo-5251

To Cite: Dalili Kajan Z, Karimi Nasab N, Khademi J, Gholinia F, Taheri Z, et al. Agreement of Dental Students in the Detection of Normal Landmarks When Comparing Digital Lateral Cephalograms and Three-Dimensional Cone Beam Computed Tomography Images, Iran J Ortho. 2016 ; 11(1):e5251. doi: 10.17795/ijo-5251.

Abstract
Copyright © 2016, Iranian Journal of Orthodontics. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
References
  • 1. Bergersen EO. Enlargement and distortion in cephalometric radiography: compensation tables for linear measurements. Angle Orthod. 1980; 50(3): 230-44[DOI][PubMed]
  • 2. Major PW, Johnson DE, Hesse KL, Glover KE. Landmark identification error in posterior anterior cephalometrics. Angle Orthod. 1994; 64(6): 447-54[DOI][PubMed]
  • 3. Chen YJ, Chen SK, Chang HF, Chen KC. Comparison of landmark identification in traditional versus computer-aided digital cephalometry. Angle Orthod. 2000; 70(5): 387-92[DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Ahlqvist J, Eliasson S, Welander U. The effect of projection errors on cephalometric length measurements. Eur J Orthod. 1986; 8(3): 141-8[PubMed]
  • 5. Mah JK, Huang JC, Choo H. Practical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in orthodontics. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010; 141 Suppl 3: 7S-13S[PubMed]
  • 6. Mah J, Hatcher D. Three-dimensional craniofacial imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004; 126(3): 308-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 7. Chien PC, Parks ET, Eraso F, Hartsfield JK, Roberts WE, Ofner S. Comparison of reliability in anatomical landmark identification using two-dimensional digital cephalometrics and three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography in vivo. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009; 38(5): 262-73[DOI][PubMed]
  • 8. Cattaneo PM, Bloch CB, Calmar D, Hjortshoj M, Melsen B. Comparison between conventional and cone-beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 134(6): 798-802[DOI][PubMed]
  • 9. Baumgaertel S, Palomo JM, Palomo L, Hans MG. Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 136(1): 19-25[DOI][PubMed]
  • 10. Graber TM, Vanarsdall RL, Vig KWL. Orthodontics: current principles and techniques. 2005; : 71-100
  • 11. Kumar V, Ludlow JB, Mol A, Cevidanes L. Comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2007; 36(5): 263-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 12. Chang ZC, Hu FC, Lai E, Yao CC, Chen MH, Chen YJ. Landmark identification errors on cone-beam computed tomography-derived cephalograms and conventional digital cephalograms. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 140(6)-97[DOI][PubMed]
  • 13. Kumar V, Ludlow J, Soares Cevidanes LH, Mol A. In vivo comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms. Angle Orthod. 2008; 78(5): 873-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 14. Lamichane M, Anderson NK, Rigali PH, Seldin EB, Will LA. Accuracy of reconstructed images from cone-beam computed tomography scans. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 136(2): 156 e1-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 15. van Vlijmen OJ, Berge SJ, Swennen GR, Bronkhorst EM, Katsaros C, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Comparison of cephalometric radiographs obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans and conventional radiographs. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 67(1): 92-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 16. Lou L, Lagravere MO, Compton S, Major PW, Flores-Mir C. Accuracy of measurements and reliability of landmark identification with computed tomography (CT) techniques in the maxillofacial area: a systematic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007; 104(3): 402-11[DOI][PubMed]
  • 17. Lagravere MO, Major PW. Proposed reference point for 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis with cone-beam computerized tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005; 128(5): 657-60[DOI][PubMed]
  • 18. Baumrind S, Frantz RC. The reliability of head film measurements. 1. Landmark identification. Am J Orthod. 1971; 60(2): 111-27[PubMed]
  • 19. Chen YJ, Chen SK, Huang HW, Yao CC, Chang HF. Reliability of landmark identification in cephalometric radiography acquired by a storage phosphor imaging system. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004; 33(5): 301-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 20. Lagravere MO, Low C, Flores-Mir C, Chung R, Carey JP, Heo G, et al. Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliabilities of landmark identification on digitized lateral cephalograms and formatted 3-dimensional cone-beam computerized tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 137(5): 598-604[DOI][PubMed]
  • 21. Reliability of digital versus conventional cephalometric radiology: a comparative evaluation of landmark identification error. Semin Orthod. : 98-110
  • 22. Moshiri M, Scarfe WC, Hilgers ML, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007; 132(4): 550-60[DOI][PubMed]
  • 23. Gribel BF, Gribel MN, Frazao DC, McNamara Jr JA, Manzi FR. Accuracy and reliability of craniometric measurements on lateral cephalometry and 3D measurements on CBCT scans. Angle Orthod. 2011; 81(1): 26-35[DOI][PubMed]
  • 24. Cattaneo PM, Melsen B. The use of cone-beam computed tomography in an orthodontic department in between research and daily clinic. World J Orthod. 2008; 9(3): 269-82[PubMed]
  • 25. de Oliveira AE, Cevidanes LH, Phillips C, Motta A, Burke B, Tyndall D. Observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on cone-beam computerized tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009; 107(2): 256-65[DOI][PubMed]
  • 26. Couceiro CP, Vilella ODV. 2D/3D cone-beam CT images or conventional radiography:Which is more reliable? Dental Press J Orthod. 2010; 15(5): 40-1
  • 27. Nakajima A, Sameshima GT, Arai Y, Homme Y, Shimizu N, Dougherty Sr H. Two- and three-dimensional orthodontic imaging using limited cone beam-computed tomography. Angle Orthod. 2005; 75(6): 895-903[DOI][PubMed]
  • 28. Ludlow JB, Gubler M, Cevidanes L, Mol A. Precision of cephalometric landmark identification: cone-beam computed tomography vs conventional cephalometric views. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 136(3): 312 e1-10[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments