Iranian Journal of Orthodontics

Published by: Kowsar

Analyzing Mesiodistal Widths of the Permanent Teeth

Fatemeh Gorjizadeh 1 , Maryam Javaheri Mahd 1 , * and Abdo Rahim Maktabi 1
Authors Information
1 Orthodontic Department, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Orthodontics: December 30, 2015, 10 (2); e4984
  • Published Online: December 29, 2015
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: November 2, 2015
  • Accepted: December 8, 2015
  • DOI: 10.17795/ijo-4984

To Cite: Gorjizadeh F, Javaheri Mahd M, Maktabi A R. Analyzing Mesiodistal Widths of the Permanent Teeth, Iran J Ortho. 2015 ; 10(2):e4984. doi: 10.17795/ijo-4984.

Abstract
Copyright © 2015, Iranian Journal of Orthodontics. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Materials and Methods
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
References
  • 1. Moyers RE, Bookstein FL, Hunter WS. Analysis of the craniofacial skeleton: Cephalometrics. 1988;
  • 2. Sanin C, Savara BS. An analysis of permanent mesiodistal crown size. Am J Orthod. 1971; 59(5): 488-500[DOI][PubMed]
  • 3. Lopatiene K, Dumbravaite A. Relationship between tooth size discrepancies and malocclusion. Stomatologija. 2009; 11(4): 119-24[PubMed]
  • 4. Freire SM, Nishio C, Mendes AM, Quintao CCA, Almeida MA. Relationship between dental size and normal occlusion in Brazilian patients. Braz Dent J. 2007; 18(3): 253-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 5. Lavelle CLB. Maxillary and mandibular tooth size in different racial groups and in different occlusal categories. Am J Orthod. 1972; 61(1): 29-37[DOI][PubMed]
  • 6. Bishara SE, Khadivi P, Jakobsen JR. Changes in tooth size—arch length relationships from the deciduous to the permanent dentition: A longitudinal study. Am J Orthod. 1995; 108(6): 607-13[DOI]
  • 7. Potter RH. Univariate versus multivariate differences in tooth size according to sex. J Dent Res. 1972; 51(3): 716-22[PubMed]
  • 8. Garn SM, Lewis AB, Kerewsky RS. Sex Difference in Tooth Size. J Dent Res. 1964; 43: 306[PubMed]
  • 9. Ballard ML, Wylie WL. Mixed dentition case analysis-estimating size of unerupted permanent teeth. Am J Orthod. 1947; 33(11): 754-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 10. Neff CW. Tailored occlusion with the anterior coefficient. Am J Orthod. 1949; 35(4): 309-13[DOI][PubMed]
  • 11. Ballard ML. Asymmetry in tooth size: A factor in the etiology, diagnosis and treatment of malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 1944; 14(3): 67-70
  • 12. Bolton WA. Disharmony In Tooth Size And Its Relation To The Analysis And Treatment Of Malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 1958; 28(3): 113-30
  • 13. Philip NI, Prabhakar M, Arora D, Chopra S. Applicability of the Moyers mixed dentition probability tables and new prediction aids for a contemporary population in India. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 138(3): 339-45[DOI][PubMed]
  • 14. Tanaka MM, Johnston LE. The prediction of the size of unerupted canines and premolars in a contemporary orthodontic population. JADA. 1974; 88(4): 798-801[DOI]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments