Iranian Journal of Orthodontics

Published by: Kowsar

Comparison Between Digital and Ordinary Methods in Analyzing Cephalometric Radiographic Images

Mehrdad Panj Noush 1 and Masomeh Esmaily 2 , *
Authors Information
1 Department of Radiology, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
2 Department of Orthodontics, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, IR Iran
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Orthodontics: June 30, 2015, 10 (1); e4862
  • Published Online: June 13, 2015
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: November 2, 2014
  • Accepted: December 9, 2014
  • DOI: 10.17795/ijo-4862

To Cite: Panj Noush M, Esmaily M. Comparison Between Digital and Ordinary Methods in Analyzing Cephalometric Radiographic Images, Iran J Ortho. 2015 ; 10(1):e4862. doi: 10.17795/ijo-4862.

Abstract
Copyright © 2015, Iranian Journal of Orthodontics.This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
References
  • 1. Fleischer-Peters A, Scholz U. [Orofacial dyskinesias from the psychosomatic viewpoint]. Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1985; 46(3): 181-90[PubMed]
  • 2. Brown M. Eight methods of analysing a cephalogram to establish anteroposterior skeletal discrepancy. Br J Orthod. 1981; 8(3): 139-46[PubMed]
  • 3. Hocevar RA, Stewart MC. A study of reference lines for mandibular plane angles. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1992; 102(6): 519-26
  • 4. Uysal T, Baysal A, Yagci A. Evaluation of speed, repeatability, and reproducibility of digital radiography with manual versus computer-assisted cephalometric analyses. Eur J Orthod. 2009; 31(5): 523-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 5. Liu JK, Chen YT, Cheng KS. Accuracy of computerized automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2000; 118(5): 535-40
  • 6. Chen YJ, Chen SK, Chung-Chen Yao J, Chang HF. The effects of differences in landmark identification on the cephalometric measurements in traditional versus digitized cephalometry. The Angle orthodontist. 2004; 74(2): 155-61
  • 7. Houston WJB. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. American journal of orthodontics. 1983; 83(5): 382-90
  • 8. Lindsten R, Ögaard B, Larsson E. Difference in dental lateral arch length between 9-year-olds born in the 1960s and the 1980s. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2000; 117(6): 663-8
  • 9. Ongkosuwito EM, Katsaros C, van 't Hof MA, Bodegom JC, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. The reproducibility of cephalometric measurements: a comparison of analogue and digital methods. Eur J Orthod. 2002; 24(6): 655-65[PubMed]
  • 10. Gravely JF, Benzies PM. The clinical significance of tracing error in cephalometry. British Journal of Orthodontics. 1974; 1(3): 95-101
  • 11. Chen YJ, Chen SK, Huang HW, Yao CC, Chang HF. Reliability of landmark identification in cephalometric radiography acquired by a storage phosphor imaging system. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004; 33(5): 301-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 12. Sayinsu K, Isik F, Trakyali G, Arun T. An evaluation of the errors in cephalometric measurements on scanned cephalometric images and conventional tracings. Eur J Orthod. 2007; 29(1): 105-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 13. Gerbo LR, Poulton DR, Covell DA, Russell CA. A comparison of a computer-based orthognathic surgery prediction system to postsurgical results. The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. 1996; 12(1): 55-63
  • 14. Turner PJ, Weerakone S. An evaluation of the reproducibility of landmark identification using scanned cephalometric images. J Orthod. 2001; 28(3): 221-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 15. Dvortsin DP, Sandham A, Pruim GJ, Dijkstra PU. A comparison of the reproducibility of manual tracing and on-screen digitization for cephalometric profile variables. The European Journal of Orthodontics. 2008; 30(6): 586-91
  • 16. Naoumova J, Lindman R. A comparison of manual traced images and corresponding scanned radiographs digitally traced. Eur J Orthod. 2009; 31(3): 247-53[DOI][PubMed]
  • 17. Celik E, Polat-Ozsoy O, Memikoglu TUT. Comparison of cephalometric measurements with digital versus conventional cephalometric analysis. The European Journal of Orthodontics. 2009;
  • 18. Singh P, Davies TI. A comparison of cephalometric measurements: a picture archiving and communication system versus the hand-tracing method—a preliminary study. The European Journal of Orthodontics. 2011; 33(4): 350-3
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments