Iranian Journal of Orthodontics

Published by: Kowsar

Comparison Between Digital and Ordinary Methods in Analyzing Cephalometric Radiographic Images

Mehrdad Panj Noush 1 and Masomeh Esmaily 2 , *
Authors Information
1 Department of Radiology, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
2 Department of Orthodontics, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, IR Iran
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Orthodontics: June 30, 2015, 10 (1); e4862
  • Published Online: June 13, 2015
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: November 2, 2014
  • Accepted: December 9, 2014
  • DOI: 10.17795/ijo-4862

To Cite: Panj Noush M, Esmaily M. Comparison Between Digital and Ordinary Methods in Analyzing Cephalometric Radiographic Images, Iran J Ortho. 2015 ; 10(1):e4862. doi: 10.17795/ijo-4862.

Copyright © 2015, Iranian Journal of Orthodontics.This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Fleischer-Peters A, Scholz U. [Orofacial dyskinesias from the psychosomatic viewpoint]. Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1985; 46(3): 181-90[PubMed]
  • 2. Brown M. Eight methods of analysing a cephalogram to establish anteroposterior skeletal discrepancy. Br J Orthod. 1981; 8(3): 139-46[PubMed]
  • 3. Hocevar RA, Stewart MC. A study of reference lines for mandibular plane angles. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1992; 102(6): 519-26
  • 4. Uysal T, Baysal A, Yagci A. Evaluation of speed, repeatability, and reproducibility of digital radiography with manual versus computer-assisted cephalometric analyses. Eur J Orthod. 2009; 31(5): 523-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 5. Liu JK, Chen YT, Cheng KS. Accuracy of computerized automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2000; 118(5): 535-40
  • 6. Chen YJ, Chen SK, Chung-Chen Yao J, Chang HF. The effects of differences in landmark identification on the cephalometric measurements in traditional versus digitized cephalometry. The Angle orthodontist. 2004; 74(2): 155-61
  • 7. Houston WJB. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. American journal of orthodontics. 1983; 83(5): 382-90
  • 8. Lindsten R, Ögaard B, Larsson E. Difference in dental lateral arch length between 9-year-olds born in the 1960s and the 1980s. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2000; 117(6): 663-8
  • 9. Ongkosuwito EM, Katsaros C, van 't Hof MA, Bodegom JC, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. The reproducibility of cephalometric measurements: a comparison of analogue and digital methods. Eur J Orthod. 2002; 24(6): 655-65[PubMed]
  • 10. Gravely JF, Benzies PM. The clinical significance of tracing error in cephalometry. British Journal of Orthodontics. 1974; 1(3): 95-101
  • 11. Chen YJ, Chen SK, Huang HW, Yao CC, Chang HF. Reliability of landmark identification in cephalometric radiography acquired by a storage phosphor imaging system. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004; 33(5): 301-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 12. Sayinsu K, Isik F, Trakyali G, Arun T. An evaluation of the errors in cephalometric measurements on scanned cephalometric images and conventional tracings. Eur J Orthod. 2007; 29(1): 105-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 13. Gerbo LR, Poulton DR, Covell DA, Russell CA. A comparison of a computer-based orthognathic surgery prediction system to postsurgical results. The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. 1996; 12(1): 55-63
  • 14. Turner PJ, Weerakone S. An evaluation of the reproducibility of landmark identification using scanned cephalometric images. J Orthod. 2001; 28(3): 221-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 15. Dvortsin DP, Sandham A, Pruim GJ, Dijkstra PU. A comparison of the reproducibility of manual tracing and on-screen digitization for cephalometric profile variables. The European Journal of Orthodontics. 2008; 30(6): 586-91
  • 16. Naoumova J, Lindman R. A comparison of manual traced images and corresponding scanned radiographs digitally traced. Eur J Orthod. 2009; 31(3): 247-53[DOI][PubMed]
  • 17. Celik E, Polat-Ozsoy O, Memikoglu TUT. Comparison of cephalometric measurements with digital versus conventional cephalometric analysis. The European Journal of Orthodontics. 2009;
  • 18. Singh P, Davies TI. A comparison of cephalometric measurements: a picture archiving and communication system versus the hand-tracing method—a preliminary study. The European Journal of Orthodontics. 2011; 33(4): 350-3
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments