Iranian Journal of Orthodontics

Published by: Kowsar

Facial-Profile Attractiveness: Comparison Amongst Orthodontists’ and Other Dental Specialists’ Ranking of Treated Profiles With the Twin Block Appliances

Ankita A. Sawant 1 , * and Shubhangi A. Mani 1
Authors Information
1 Department of Orthodontics, Rural Dental College, Pravara Institute of Medical Sciences, Loni, India
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Orthodontics: December 28, 2014, 9 (3); e4856
  • Published Online: December 30, 2014
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: September 30, 2014
  • Accepted: December 16, 2014
  • DOI: 10.17795/ijo-3748

To Cite: Sawant A A, Mani S A. Facial-Profile Attractiveness: Comparison Amongst Orthodontists’ and Other Dental Specialists’ Ranking of Treated Profiles With the Twin Block Appliances, Iran J Ortho. 2014 ; 9(3):e4856. doi: 10.17795/ijo-3748.

Copyright © 2014, Iranian Journal of Orthodontics.This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Abu Arqoub SH, Al-Khateeb SN. Perception of facial profile attractiveness of different antero-posterior and vertical proportions. Eur J Orthod. 2011; 33(1): 103-11[DOI][PubMed]
  • 2. Chan EK, Soh J, Petocz P, Darendeliler MA. Esthetic evaluation of Asian-Chinese profiles from a white perspective. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 133(4): 532-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 3. De Smit A, Dermaut L. Soft-tissue profile preference. Am J Orthod. 1984; 86(1): 67-73
  • 4. Kerr WJ, O'Donnell JM. Panel perception of facial attractiveness. Br J Orthod. 1990; 17(4): 299-304[PubMed]
  • 5. Knight H, Keith O. Ranking facial attractiveness. Eur J Orthod. 2005; 27(4): 340-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 6. Maple JR, Vig KW, Beck FM, Larsen PE, Shanker S. A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005; 128(6): 690-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 7. Ng D, De Silva RK, Smit R, De Silva H, Farella M. Facial attractiveness of skeletal Class II patients before and after mandibular advancement surgery as perceived by people with different backgrounds. Eur J Orthod. 2013; 35(4): 515-20[DOI][PubMed]
  • 8. Cox NH, van der Linden FPGM. Facial harmony. Am J Orthod. 1971; 60(2): 175-83[DOI]
  • 9. Czarnecki ST, Nanda RS, Currier GF. Perceptions of a balanced facial profile. Am J Orthodont Dent Orthoped. 1993; 104(2): 180-7[DOI]
  • 10. Naini FB, Donaldson AN, Cobourne MT, McDonald F. Assessing the influence of mandibular prominence on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician, and layperson. Eur J Orthod. 2012; 34(6): 738-46[DOI][PubMed]
  • 11. Foster EJ. Profile preferences among diversified groups. Angle Orthod. 1973; 43(1): 34-40[DOI][PubMed]
  • 12. Macias Gago AB, Romero Maroto M, Crego A. The perception of facial aesthetics in a young Spanish population. Eur J Orthod. 2012; 34(3): 335-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 13. Shafiee R, Korn EL, Pearson H, Boyd RL, Baumrind S. Evaluation of facial attractiveness from end-of-treatment facial photographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 133(4): 500-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 14. Chaiyongsirisern A, Rabie AB, Wong RW. Stepwise advancement Herbst appliance versus mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. Treatment effects and long-term stability of adult Class II patients. Angle Orthod. 2009; 79(6): 1084-94[DOI][PubMed]
  • 15. Maganzini AL, Tseng JY, Epstein JZ. Perception of facial esthetics by native Chinese participants by using manipulated digital imagery techniques. Angle Orthod. 2000; 70(5): 393-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 16. Soh J, Chew MT, Wong HB. A comparative assessment of the perception of Chinese facial profile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005; 127(6): 692-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 17. Romani KL, Agahi F, Nanda R, Zernik JH. Evaluation of horizontal and vertical differences in facial profiles by orthodontists and lay people. Angle Orthod. 1993; 63(3): 175-82[DOI][PubMed]
  • 18. Shelly AD, Southard TE, Southard KA, Casko JS, Jakobsen JR, Fridrich KL, et al. Evaluation of profile esthetic change with mandibular advancement surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000; 117(6): 630-7[PubMed]
  • 19. Cochrane SM, Cunningham SJ, Hunt NP. A comparison of the perception of facial profile by the general public and 3 groups of clinicians. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1999; 14(4): 291-5[PubMed]
  • 20. Spyropoulos MN, Halazonetis DJ. Significance of the soft tissue profile on facial esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001; 119(5): 464-71[DOI][PubMed]
  • 21. Orsini MG, Huang GJ, Kiyak HA, Ramsay DS, Bollen AM, Anderson NK, et al. Methods to evaluate profile preferences for the anteroposterior position of the mandible. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 130(3): 283-91[DOI][PubMed]
  • 22. Foos PW, Clark MC. Adult age and gender differences in perceptions of facial attractiveness: beauty is in the eye of the older beholder. J Genet Psychol. 2011; 172(2): 162-75[DOI][PubMed]
  • 23. Phillips C, Griffin T, Bennett E. Perception of facial attractiveness by patients, peers, and professionals. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1995; 10(2): 127-35[PubMed]
  • 24. al Yami EA, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Van 't Hof MA. Assessment of dental and facial aesthetics in adolescents. Eur J Orthod. 1998; 20(4): 399-405[PubMed]
  • 25. Matoula S, Pancherz H. Skeletofacial morphology of attractive and nonattractive faces. Angle Orthod. 2006; 76(2): 204-10[DOI][PubMed]
  • 26. Sloss EA, Southard KA, Qian F, Stock SE, Mann KR, Meyer DL, et al. Comparison of soft-tissue profiles after treatment with headgear or Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 133(4): 509-14[DOI][PubMed]
  • 27. Honekopp J. Once more: is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Relative contributions of private and shared taste to judgments of facial attractiveness. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006; 32(2): 199-209[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments