Iranian Journal of Orthodontics

Published by: Kowsar

Facial-Profile Attractiveness: Comparison Amongst Orthodontists’ and Other Dental Specialists’ Ranking of Treated Profiles With the Twin Block Appliances

Ankita A. Sawant 1 , * and Shubhangi A. Mani 1
Authors Information
1 Department of Orthodontics, Rural Dental College, Pravara Institute of Medical Sciences, Loni, India
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Orthodontics: December 28, 2014, 9 (3); e4856
  • Published Online: December 30, 2014
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: September 30, 2014
  • Accepted: December 16, 2014
  • DOI: 10.17795/ijo-3748

To Cite: Sawant A A, Mani S A. Facial-Profile Attractiveness: Comparison Amongst Orthodontists’ and Other Dental Specialists’ Ranking of Treated Profiles With the Twin Block Appliances, Iran J Ortho. 2014 ; 9(3):e4856. doi: 10.17795/ijo-3748.

Abstract
Copyright © 2014, Iranian Journal of Orthodontics.This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
References
  • 1. Abu Arqoub SH, Al-Khateeb SN. Perception of facial profile attractiveness of different antero-posterior and vertical proportions. Eur J Orthod. 2011; 33(1): 103-11[DOI][PubMed]
  • 2. Chan EK, Soh J, Petocz P, Darendeliler MA. Esthetic evaluation of Asian-Chinese profiles from a white perspective. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 133(4): 532-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 3. De Smit A, Dermaut L. Soft-tissue profile preference. Am J Orthod. 1984; 86(1): 67-73
  • 4. Kerr WJ, O'Donnell JM. Panel perception of facial attractiveness. Br J Orthod. 1990; 17(4): 299-304[PubMed]
  • 5. Knight H, Keith O. Ranking facial attractiveness. Eur J Orthod. 2005; 27(4): 340-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 6. Maple JR, Vig KW, Beck FM, Larsen PE, Shanker S. A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005; 128(6): 690-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 7. Ng D, De Silva RK, Smit R, De Silva H, Farella M. Facial attractiveness of skeletal Class II patients before and after mandibular advancement surgery as perceived by people with different backgrounds. Eur J Orthod. 2013; 35(4): 515-20[DOI][PubMed]
  • 8. Cox NH, van der Linden FPGM. Facial harmony. Am J Orthod. 1971; 60(2): 175-83[DOI]
  • 9. Czarnecki ST, Nanda RS, Currier GF. Perceptions of a balanced facial profile. Am J Orthodont Dent Orthoped. 1993; 104(2): 180-7[DOI]
  • 10. Naini FB, Donaldson AN, Cobourne MT, McDonald F. Assessing the influence of mandibular prominence on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician, and layperson. Eur J Orthod. 2012; 34(6): 738-46[DOI][PubMed]
  • 11. Foster EJ. Profile preferences among diversified groups. Angle Orthod. 1973; 43(1): 34-40[DOI][PubMed]
  • 12. Macias Gago AB, Romero Maroto M, Crego A. The perception of facial aesthetics in a young Spanish population. Eur J Orthod. 2012; 34(3): 335-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 13. Shafiee R, Korn EL, Pearson H, Boyd RL, Baumrind S. Evaluation of facial attractiveness from end-of-treatment facial photographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 133(4): 500-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 14. Chaiyongsirisern A, Rabie AB, Wong RW. Stepwise advancement Herbst appliance versus mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. Treatment effects and long-term stability of adult Class II patients. Angle Orthod. 2009; 79(6): 1084-94[DOI][PubMed]
  • 15. Maganzini AL, Tseng JY, Epstein JZ. Perception of facial esthetics by native Chinese participants by using manipulated digital imagery techniques. Angle Orthod. 2000; 70(5): 393-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 16. Soh J, Chew MT, Wong HB. A comparative assessment of the perception of Chinese facial profile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005; 127(6): 692-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 17. Romani KL, Agahi F, Nanda R, Zernik JH. Evaluation of horizontal and vertical differences in facial profiles by orthodontists and lay people. Angle Orthod. 1993; 63(3): 175-82[DOI][PubMed]
  • 18. Shelly AD, Southard TE, Southard KA, Casko JS, Jakobsen JR, Fridrich KL, et al. Evaluation of profile esthetic change with mandibular advancement surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000; 117(6): 630-7[PubMed]
  • 19. Cochrane SM, Cunningham SJ, Hunt NP. A comparison of the perception of facial profile by the general public and 3 groups of clinicians. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1999; 14(4): 291-5[PubMed]
  • 20. Spyropoulos MN, Halazonetis DJ. Significance of the soft tissue profile on facial esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001; 119(5): 464-71[DOI][PubMed]
  • 21. Orsini MG, Huang GJ, Kiyak HA, Ramsay DS, Bollen AM, Anderson NK, et al. Methods to evaluate profile preferences for the anteroposterior position of the mandible. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 130(3): 283-91[DOI][PubMed]
  • 22. Foos PW, Clark MC. Adult age and gender differences in perceptions of facial attractiveness: beauty is in the eye of the older beholder. J Genet Psychol. 2011; 172(2): 162-75[DOI][PubMed]
  • 23. Phillips C, Griffin T, Bennett E. Perception of facial attractiveness by patients, peers, and professionals. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1995; 10(2): 127-35[PubMed]
  • 24. al Yami EA, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Van 't Hof MA. Assessment of dental and facial aesthetics in adolescents. Eur J Orthod. 1998; 20(4): 399-405[PubMed]
  • 25. Matoula S, Pancherz H. Skeletofacial morphology of attractive and nonattractive faces. Angle Orthod. 2006; 76(2): 204-10[DOI][PubMed]
  • 26. Sloss EA, Southard KA, Qian F, Stock SE, Mann KR, Meyer DL, et al. Comparison of soft-tissue profiles after treatment with headgear or Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 133(4): 509-14[DOI][PubMed]
  • 27. Honekopp J. Once more: is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Relative contributions of private and shared taste to judgments of facial attractiveness. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006; 32(2): 199-209[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments