Iranian Journal of Orthodontics

Published by: Kowsar

Comparison of Debonding Characteristics of the Conventional Metal and Self-Ligating Brackets to Enamel: An in Vitro Study

Mohammad Karim Soltani 1 , Sadegh Barkhori 1 , Yoones Alizadeh 2 and Farzaneh Golfeshan 1 , *
Authors Information
1 Department of Orthodontics, Dental Faculty, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, IR Iran
2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amir Kabir University of Technology, Tehran, IR Iran
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Orthodontics: December 28, 2014, 9 (3); e4842
  • Published Online: December 30, 2014
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: August 3, 2014
  • Accepted: August 12, 2014
  • DOI: 10.17795/ijo-3739

To Cite: Karim Soltani M, Barkhori S, Alizadeh Y, Golfeshan F. Comparison of Debonding Characteristics of the Conventional Metal and Self-Ligating Brackets to Enamel: An in Vitro Study, Iran J Ortho. 2014 ; 9(3):e4842. doi: 10.17795/ijo-3739.

Copyright © 2014, Iranian Journal of Orthodontics.This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Schuler FS, van Waes H. SEM-evaluation of enamel surfaces after removal of fixed orthodontic appliances. Am J Dent. 2003; 16(6): 390-4[PubMed]
  • 2. Pignatta LMB, Duarte Junior S, Santos ECA. Evaluation of enamel surface after bracket debonding and polishing. Den Press J Orthod. 2012; 17(4): 77-84
  • 3. Mahdi H, Ghaib NH, Saloom HF. Evaluation of enamel surface damage after debonding using three different pliers. Mustansiria Dent J. 2011; 8(3): 281-7
  • 4. Karamouzos A, Athanasiou AE, Papadopoulos MA. Clinical characteristics and properties of ceramic brackets: A comprehensive review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997; 112(1): 34-40[PubMed]
  • 5. Yapel MJ, Quick DC. Experimental traumatic debonding of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod. 1994; 64(2): 131-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 6. Rouleau BJ, Marshall GJ, Cooley RO. Enamel surface evaluations after clinical treatment and removal of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod. 1982; 81(5): 423-6[PubMed]
  • 7. Bishara SE, Trulove TS. Comparisons of different debonding techniques for ceramic brackets: An in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990; 98(3): 263-73[DOI]
  • 8. Redd TB, Shivapuja PK. Debonding ceramic brackets: effects on enamel. J Clin Orthod. 1991; 25(8): 475-81[PubMed]
  • 9. Bishara SE, Ostby AW, Laffoon J, Warren JJ. Enamel cracks and ceramic bracket failure during debonding in vitro. Angle Orthod. 2008; 78(6): 1078-83[DOI][PubMed]
  • 10. Sharma-Sayal SK, Rossouw PE, Kulkarni GV, Titley KC. The influence of orthodontic bracket base design on shear bond strength. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 124(1): 74-82[DOI][PubMed]
  • 11. Oh KT, Choo SU, Kim KM, Kim KN. A stainless steel bracket for orthodontic application. Eur J Orthod. 2005; 27(3): 237-44[DOI][PubMed]
  • 12. Kitahara-Ceia FM, Mucha JN, Marques dos Santos PA. Assessment of enamel damage after removal of ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 134(4): 548-55[DOI][PubMed]
  • 13. Liu JK, Chung CH, Chang CY, Shieh DB. Bond strength and debonding characteristics of a new ceramic bracket. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005; 128(6): 761-5[DOI][PubMed]
  • 14. Chen SS, Greenlee GM, Kim JE, Smith CL, Huang GJ. Systematic review of self-ligating brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 137(6): 726 e1-726 e18[DOI][PubMed]
  • 15. Cehreli SB, Polat-Ozsoy O, Sar C, Cubukcu HE, Cehreli ZC. A comparative study of qualitative and quantitative methods for the assessment of adhesive remnant after bracket debonding. Eur J Orthod. 2012; 34(2): 188-92[DOI][PubMed]
  • 16. Alessandri Bonetti G, Zanarini M, Incerti Parenti S, Lattuca M, Marchionni S, Gatto MR. Evaluation of enamel surfaces after bracket debonding: an in-vivo study with scanning electron microscopy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 140(5): 696-702[DOI][PubMed]
  • 17. Habibi M, Nik TH, Hooshmand T. Comparison of debonding characteristics of metal and ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel: an in-vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007; 132(5): 675-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 18. Bishara SE, Fehr DE, Jakobsen JR. A comparative study of the debonding strengths of different ceramic brackets, enamel conditioners, and adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993; 104(2): 170-9[DOI]
  • 19. Mundstock KS, Sadowsky PL, Lacefield W, Bae S. An in vitro evaluation of a metal reinforced orthodontic ceramic bracket. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999; 116(6): 635-41[PubMed]
  • 20. Wang WN, Li CH, Chou TH, Wang DD, Lin LH, Lin CT. Bond strength of various bracket base designs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004; 125(1): 65-70[DOI][PubMed]
  • 21. Cucu M, Driessen CH, Ferreira PD. The influence of orthodontic bracket base diameter and mesh size on bond strength. SADJ. 2002; 57(1): 16-20[PubMed]
  • 22. Santos BM, Pithon MM, Ruellas AC, Sant'Anna EF. Shear bond strength of brackets bonded with hydrophilic and hydrophobic bond systems under contamination. Angle Orthod. 2010; 80(5): 963-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 23. Zachrisson BU, Skogan O, Hoymyhr S. Enamel cracks in debonded, debanded, and orthodontically untreated teeth. Am J Orthod. 1980; 77(3): 307-19[PubMed]
  • 24. Zachrisson BU, Buyukyilmaz T. Orthodontics: Current principles and techniques. 2005; : 612-9
  • 25. Heravi F, Rashed R, Raziee L. The effects of bracket removal on enamel. Aust Orthod J. 2008; 24(2): 110-5[PubMed]
  • 26. Bishara SE, Fonseca JM, Boyer DB. The use of debonding pliers in the removal of ceramic brackets: force levels and enamel cracks. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995; 108(3): 242-8[PubMed]
  • 27. Zachrisson YO, Zachrisson BU, Buyukyilmaz T. Surface preparation for orthodontic bonding to porcelain. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996; 109(4): 420-30[PubMed]
  • 28. Bishara SE, Olsen ME, VonWald L, Jakobsen JR. Comparison of the debonding characteristics of two innovative ceramic bracket designs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999; 116(1): 86-92[PubMed]
  • 29. D'Attilio M, Traini T, Di Iorio D, Varvara G, Festa F, Tecco S. Shear bond strength, bond failure, and scanning electron microscopy analysis of a new flowable composite for orthodontic use. Angle Orthod. 2005; 75(3): 410-5[DOI][PubMed]
  • 30. Ryf S, Flury S, Palaniappan S, Lussi A, van Meerbeek B, Zimmerli B. Enamel loss and adhesive remnants following bracket removal and various clean-up procedures in vitro. Eur J Orthod. 2012; 34(1): 25-32[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments